Re: [PATCH 1/1] xfs/270: update commit id for _fixed_by tag.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 02:42:56PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Update the commit id in the _fixed_by tag now that we've merged the
> kernel fix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/270 |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/270 b/tests/xfs/270
> index 7d4e1f6a87..4e4f767dc1 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/270
> +++ b/tests/xfs/270
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ _begin_fstest auto quick mount
>  
>  # real QA test starts here
>  _supported_fs xfs
> -_fixed_by_kernel_commit xxxxxxxxxxxx \
> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit 74ad4693b647 \
>  	"xfs: fix log recovery when unknown rocompat bits are set"

This patch is good to me, but we have more xfs cases have fixed commit which
have been merged:

$ grep -rsni xxxxxxxx tests/xfs|grep _fixed
tests/xfs/600:23:_fixed_by_git_commit kernel XXXXXXXXXXXXX \
tests/xfs/557:21:_fixed_by_kernel_commit XXXXXXXXXXXX \
tests/xfs/270:20:_fixed_by_kernel_commit xxxxxxxxxxxx \

xfs/600: cfa2df68b7ce xfs: fix an agbno overflow in __xfs_getfsmap_datadev
xfs/557: 817644fa4525 xfs: get root inode correctly at bulkstat

Do you want to fix them in one patch, or you hope to merge this
patch at first?

Thanks,
Zorro


>  # skip fs check because superblock contains unknown ro-compat features
>  _require_scratch_nocheck
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux