On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 09:15:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There isn't much use for this trivial wrapper, especially as the NULL
> check is only needed in a single call site.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 18 +++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index d2f3ae6ba8938b..f00d1162815d19 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -395,15 +395,6 @@ xfs_blkdev_get(
> return error;
> }
>
> -STATIC void
> -xfs_blkdev_put(
> - struct xfs_mount *mp,
> - struct block_device *bdev)
> -{
> - if (bdev)
> - blkdev_put(bdev, mp->m_super);
> -}
> -
> STATIC void
> xfs_close_devices(
> struct xfs_mount *mp)
> @@ -412,13 +403,13 @@ xfs_close_devices(
> struct block_device *logdev = mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev;
>
> xfs_free_buftarg(mp->m_logdev_targp);
> - xfs_blkdev_put(mp, logdev);
> + blkdev_put(logdev, mp->m_super);
> }
> if (mp->m_rtdev_targp) {
> struct block_device *rtdev = mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev;
>
> xfs_free_buftarg(mp->m_rtdev_targp);
> - xfs_blkdev_put(mp, rtdev);
> + blkdev_put(rtdev, mp->m_super);
> }
> xfs_free_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp);
> }
> @@ -503,10 +494,11 @@ xfs_open_devices(
> out_free_ddev_targ:
> xfs_free_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp);
> out_close_rtdev:
> - xfs_blkdev_put(mp, rtdev);
> + if (rtdev)
nit: I think there's a stray space here.
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
