On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 9:45 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You snipped the suspicion in my reply on why that exists, to avoid
> io_wq_worker_sleeping() triggering.
I'm not seeing why triggering io_wq_worker_sleeping() should even be a
problem in the first place.
I suspect that is entirely historical too, and has to do with how it
used to do that
struct io_worker *worker = kthread_data(tsk);
struct io_wqe *wqe = worker->wqe;
back in the bad old days of kthreads.
But yeah, I don't know that code.
Linus
