Hi! > > I'm starting to wonder if we should start tracking minimal FS size per > > filesystem since btrfs and xfs will likely to continue to grow and with > > that we will end up disabling the whole fs related testing on embedded > > boards with a little disk space. If we tracked that per filesystem we > > would be able to skip a subset of filesystems when there is not enough > > space. The downside is obviously that we would have to add a bit more > > complexity to the test library. > > Maybe I could for start rewrite v2 (I've sent it without Cc kernel devs now it's > mainly LTP internal thing) as it just to have 300 MB for XFS and 256 MB for the > rest. That would require to specify filesystem when acquiring device (NULL would > be for the default filesystem), that's would be worth if embedded folks counter > each MB. It'd be nice to hear from them. The 256MB limit was set previously due to btrfs, I bet that we can create smaller images for ext filesytems for example. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@xxxxxxx
