Hi Cyril, > Hi! > I'm starting to wonder if we should start tracking minimal FS size per > filesystem since btrfs and xfs will likely to continue to grow and with > that we will end up disabling the whole fs related testing on embedded > boards with a little disk space. If we tracked that per filesystem we > would be able to skip a subset of filesystems when there is not enough > space. The downside is obviously that we would have to add a bit more > complexity to the test library. Maybe I could for start rewrite v2 (I've sent it without Cc kernel devs now it's mainly LTP internal thing) as it just to have 300 MB for XFS and 256 MB for the rest. That would require to specify filesystem when acquiring device (NULL would be for the default filesystem), that's would be worth if embedded folks counter each MB. It'd be nice to hear from them. Kind regards, Petr
