Re: [PATCH] xfs/432: fix this test when external devices are in use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 03:47:56PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 08:06:00AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 12:51:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > This program exercises metadump and mdrestore being run against the
> > > scratch device.  Therefore, the test must pass external log / rt device
> > > arguments to xfs_repair -n to check the "restored" filesystem.  Fix the
> > > incorrect usage, and report repair failures, since this test has been
> > > silently failing for a while now.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/xfs/432 |   11 ++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/432 b/tests/xfs/432
> > > index 86012f0b..5c6744ce 100755
> > > --- a/tests/xfs/432
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/432
> > > @@ -89,7 +89,16 @@ _scratch_xfs_metadump $metadump_file -w
> > >  xfs_mdrestore $metadump_file $metadump_img
> > >  
> > >  echo "Check restored metadump image"
> > > -$XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $metadump_img >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > +repair_args=('-n')
> > > +[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV" ] && \
> > > +	repair_args+=('-l' "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV")
> > > +
> > > +[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_RTDEV" ] && \
> > > +	repair_args+=('-r' "$SCRATCH_RTDEV")
> > > +
> > > +$XFS_REPAIR_PROG "${repair_args[@]}" $metadump_img >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > +res=$?
> > > +test $res -ne 0 && echo "xfs_repair on restored fs returned $res?"
> > 
> > I don't like open coding external device support into individual
> > tests.
> > 
> > i.e. Shouldn't this use a wrapper around check_xfs_filesystem()
> > similar to _check_xfs_test_fs()? Call it check_xfs_scratch_fs() that
> > uses SCRATCH_DEV by default, but if $1 is passed in use that as the
> > scratch device instead?
> 
> Yeah, that would also work.  IIRC there's one other fstest that does
> something similar to this.

Actually, there already is a _scratch_xfs_repair, so I think I'll just
re(ab)use it:

SCRATCH_DEV=$metadump_img _scratch_xfs_repair -n &>> $seqres.full || \
	echo "xfs_repair on restored fs returned $?"

--D

> --D
> 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Dave.
> > -- 
> > Dave Chinner
> > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux