On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 12:51:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This program exercises metadump and mdrestore being run against the
> scratch device. Therefore, the test must pass external log / rt device
> arguments to xfs_repair -n to check the "restored" filesystem. Fix the
> incorrect usage, and report repair failures, since this test has been
> silently failing for a while now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/xfs/432 | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/432 b/tests/xfs/432
> index 86012f0b..5c6744ce 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/432
> +++ b/tests/xfs/432
> @@ -89,7 +89,16 @@ _scratch_xfs_metadump $metadump_file -w
> xfs_mdrestore $metadump_file $metadump_img
>
> echo "Check restored metadump image"
> -$XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $metadump_img >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +repair_args=('-n')
> +[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV" ] && \
> + repair_args+=('-l' "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV")
> +
> +[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_RTDEV" ] && \
> + repair_args+=('-r' "$SCRATCH_RTDEV")
> +
> +$XFS_REPAIR_PROG "${repair_args[@]}" $metadump_img >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +res=$?
> +test $res -ne 0 && echo "xfs_repair on restored fs returned $res?"
I don't like open coding external device support into individual
tests.
i.e. Shouldn't this use a wrapper around check_xfs_filesystem()
similar to _check_xfs_test_fs()? Call it check_xfs_scratch_fs() that
uses SCRATCH_DEV by default, but if $1 is passed in use that as the
scratch device instead?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
