On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 07:45:52PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> @@ -1357,46 +1370,45 @@ xfs_attr_node_hasname(
>
> STATIC int
> xfs_attr_node_addname_find_attr(
> - struct xfs_attr_item *attr)
> + struct xfs_attr_item *attr)
> {
> - struct xfs_da_args *args = attr->xattri_da_args;
> - int retval;
> + struct xfs_da_args *args = attr->xattri_da_args;
> + int error;
>
> /*
> * Search to see if name already exists, and get back a pointer
> * to where it should go.
> */
> - retval = xfs_attr_node_hasname(args, &attr->xattri_da_state);
> - if (retval != -ENOATTR && retval != -EEXIST)
> - goto error;
> -
> - if (retval == -ENOATTR && (args->attr_flags & XATTR_REPLACE))
> - goto error;
> - if (retval == -EEXIST) {
> - if (args->attr_flags & XATTR_CREATE)
> + error = xfs_attr_node_hasname(args, &attr->xattri_da_state);
> + switch (error) {
> + case -ENOATTR:
> + if (args->op_flags & XFS_DA_OP_REPLACE)
> + goto error;
> + break;
> + case -EEXIST:
> + if (!(args->op_flags & XFS_DA_OP_REPLACE))
> goto error;
>
> - trace_xfs_attr_node_replace(args);
> -
> - /* save the attribute state for later removal*/
> - args->op_flags |= XFS_DA_OP_RENAME; /* atomic rename op */
> - xfs_attr_save_rmt_blk(args);
>
> + trace_xfs_attr_node_replace(args);
> /*
> - * clear the remote attr state now that it is saved so that the
> - * values reflect the state of the attribute we are about to
> + * Save the existing remote attr state so that the current
> + * values reflect the state of the new attribute we are about to
> * add, not the attribute we just found and will remove later.
> */
> - args->rmtblkno = 0;
> - args->rmtblkcnt = 0;
> - args->rmtvaluelen = 0;
> + xfs_attr_save_rmt_blk(args);
Ok, removing the rmtblk zeroing right there is a bug. Not sure how I
introduced that, or why it didn't show up until this afternoon. The
leaf version of this same code is correct, and it triggers on
generic/026 when larp = 0 but not when larp = 1.
I've fixed it, but vger is constipated again and I patches sent 8
hours ago haven't reached the list yet so when I arrives I'll post
an updated version of this patch against it....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
