Re: [PATCH V2 12/12] xfs: Error tag to test if v5 bulkstat skips inodes with large extent count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28 Jul 2021 at 04:40, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 05:15:41PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
>> This commit adds a new error tag to allow user space tests to check if V5
>> bulkstat ioctl skips reporting inodes with large extent count.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Keep in mind that each of these injection knobs costs us 4 bytes per
> mount.  No particular objections, but I don't know how urgently we need
> to do that to test a corner case...
>

How about using the existing error tag XFS_RANDOM_REDUCE_MAX_IEXTENTS instead
of creating a new one? XFS_RANDOM_REDUCE_MAX_IEXTENTS conveys the meaning that
we use a pseudo max data/attr fork extent count. IMHO this fits into the
bulkstat testing use case where we use a pseudo max data fork extent count.

--
chandan



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux