On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 06:25:14AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 08:56:30AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 06:32:18PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 4:47 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:15:00AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > > I suppose I could make the '-g' switch call 'make group.list', though > > > > > that's just going to increase the amount of noise for anyone like me who > > > > > runs fstests with a mostly readonly rootfs. > > > > > > > > Just stick to the original version and see if anyone screams loud > > > > > > What is the original version? > > > > Assuming the developer is smart enough to run 'make all install' before > > running fstests. > > So install is also required now? I have never before installed xfstests > I think. No, install is not required, but running make after updating fstests is required, at least some tests may introduce new test binary in src and the binary is missing if you don't run make. So I think make is fine after updating fstests. Thanks, Eryu
