On 5/25/21 1:52 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:55:03PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
This ASSERT checks for the state value of RM_SHRINK in the set path.
Which would be invalid, and should never happen. This change is being
set aside from the rest of the set for further discussion
Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
index 32d451b..7294a2e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
@@ -612,7 +612,6 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
error = xfs_attr_node_addname_clear_incomplete(dac);
break;
default:
- ASSERT(dac->dela_state != XFS_DAS_RM_SHRINK);
ASSERT(0); ?
AFAICT the switch statement covers all the states mentioned in the state
diagram for attr setting, so in theory it should be impossible to land
in this state, correct?
Yes, that's correct, so ASSERT(0); should work too. I am fine with this
change if others are.
Allison
--D
break;
}
out:
--
2.7.4
