On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 07:29:05AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:40:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:59:20PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The pitfalls of regression testing on a machine without realising
> > > that selinux was disabled. Only set the attr fork during inode
> > > allocation if the attr feature bits are already set on the
> > > superblock.
> >
> > This doesn't apply to the current xfs/for-next tree to me, with
> > rejects in xfs_default_attroffset.
>
> Not sure why you'd get rejects in xfs_default_attroffset() given
> this patch doesn't change that function at all.
>
> The whole series applies fine here on 5.12-rc6 + xfs/for-next. Head
> of the xfs/for-next branch I'm using is commit 25dfa65f8149 ("xfs:
> fix xfs_trans slab cache name") which matches the head commit in the
> kernel.org tree...
Yes. that's the one I tried to apply it to. Oh, bloddy git-am trying
to sort by something applies "xfs: precalculate default inode attribute
offset" first. This has been happening to me a bit lately. Sorry for
the noise.
