On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:40:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:59:20PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The pitfalls of regression testing on a machine without realising
> > that selinux was disabled. Only set the attr fork during inode
> > allocation if the attr feature bits are already set on the
> > superblock.
>
> This doesn't apply to the current xfs/for-next tree to me, with
> rejects in xfs_default_attroffset.
Not sure why you'd get rejects in xfs_default_attroffset() given
this patch doesn't change that function at all.
The whole series applies fine here on 5.12-rc6 + xfs/for-next. Head
of the xfs/for-next branch I'm using is commit 25dfa65f8149 ("xfs:
fix xfs_trans slab cache name") which matches the head commit in the
kernel.org tree...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
