Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:03:37 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210223054748.3292734-2-david@fromorbit.com>
References: <20210223054748.3292734-1-david@fromorbit.com> <20210223054748.3292734-2-david@fromorbit.com>

Any reason to not just mark them static inline and move them to
xfs_types.h?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive
  - From: Dave Chinner

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] xfs: 64kb directory block verification hurts
  - From: Dave Chinner
- [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: buffer log item optimisations
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux