On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 03:44:59AM -0400, Keyur Patel wrote: > ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:56: unnecssary ==> unnecessary > ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:59: behavour ==> behaviour > ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:206: unitialized ==> uninitialized > > Signed-off-by: Keyur Patel <iamkeyur96@xxxxxxxxx> Looks simple enough, though I bet this will have to be rebased against 5.8... Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c > index 6f84ea85fdd8..5c93e8e6de74 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c > @@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ xfs_inobp_check( > * If the readahead buffer is invalid, we need to mark it with an error and > * clear the DONE status of the buffer so that a followup read will re-read it > * from disk. We don't report the error otherwise to avoid warnings during log > - * recovery and we don't get unnecssary panics on debug kernels. We use EIO here > + * recovery and we don't get unnecessary panics on debug kernels. We use EIO here > * because all we want to do is say readahead failed; there is no-one to report > * the error to, so this will distinguish it from a non-ra verifier failure. > - * Changes to this readahead error behavour also need to be reflected in > + * Changes to this readahead error behaviour also need to be reflected in > * xfs_dquot_buf_readahead_verify(). > */ > static void > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ xfs_inode_from_disk( > /* > * First get the permanent information that is needed to allocate an > * inode. If the inode is unused, mode is zero and we shouldn't mess > - * with the unitialized part of it. > + * with the uninitialized part of it. > */ > to->di_flushiter = be16_to_cpu(from->di_flushiter); > inode->i_generation = be32_to_cpu(from->di_gen); > -- > 2.26.2 >
