Re: [PATCH 2/4] generic: test per-type quota softlimit enforcement timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/1/20 7:48 AM, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 12:15:17AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:00:11PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> From: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Set different block & inode grace timers for user, group and project
>>> quotas, then test softlimit enforcement timeout, make sure different
>>> grace timers as expected.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>> I saw the following failure as well on xfs (as Zorro mentioned in his v3
>> patch)
>>
>>      -pwrite: Disk quota exceeded
>>      +pwrite: No space left on device
>>
>> So this is an xfs issue that needs to be fixed? Just want to make sure
>> the current expected test result.
> 
> Hmm.... I think I'd better to filter ENOSPC|EDQUOT. I can't be sure all
> filesystems will return EDQUOT or ENOSPC 100%, especially for group and project
> quota.
> 
> But I think Eric's trying to change a return value of XFS quota. I don't know the
> current status.

This test will need to be updated, it sounds like ext4 does not plan to switch
to ENOSPC for project quota, so we'll need modify it to accept either one.

Zorro, didn't you do that for another test?  Maybe you can do the same here?

Thanks,
-Eric




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux