On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 08:34:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The last argument to xfs_bmapi_raad contains XFS_BMAPI_* flags, not the > fork. Given that XFS_DATA_FORK evaluates to 0 no real harm is done, > but let's fix this anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> Heh. Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c > index f42c74cb8be53..9498ced947be9 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ xfs_rtbuf_get( > > ip = issum ? mp->m_rsumip : mp->m_rbmip; > > - error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, block, 1, &map, &nmap, XFS_DATA_FORK); > + error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, block, 1, &map, &nmap, 0); > if (error) > return error; > > -- > 2.26.2 >