Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:20:47 -0700
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kate Stewart <kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@xxxxxxxxx>, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAHk-=wi2bdXuYhC9bd9FShtcf_u-6RUb3Qr_aXq3XtbCxR5NGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200425133504.GA11354@nishad> <20200427155617.GY6749@magnolia> <20200427172959.GB3936841@kroah.com> <515362d10c06567f35f0d5b7c3f2e121769fb04b.camel@perches.com> <20200427174611.GA4035548@kroah.com> <791a97d5d4dfd11af533a0bbd6ae27d1a2d479ee.camel@perches.com> <20200427183629.GA20158@kroah.com> <16b209d0b0c8034db62f8d4d0a260a00f0aa5d5e.camel@perches.com> <CAHk-=wgN=Ox112_O=GQ-kwMxYduix9gZFsr1GXXJWLpDpNDm5g@mail.gmail.com> <fdcc8aa5a506ba9c6a3e6e68a7147161424985bf.camel@perches.com> <CAHk-=wi2bdXuYhC9bd9FShtcf_u-6RUb3Qr_aXq3XtbCxR5NGQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Evolution 3.36.1-2

On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 13:46 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There is simply no point in EVER changing "GPL-2.0" into
> "GPL-2.0-only" etc, unless the thing is then touched for some other
> reason (which it may never be).

Which is _exactly_ what is happening here.

But the reason _not_ to touch it here is there would
be a difference between the SPDX license text in the
.c and .h files in the directory.

References:
- [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Nishad Kamdar
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Joe Perches
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Joe Perches
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Joe Perches
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Joe Perches
- Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
  - From: Linus Torvalds

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/19] xfs: refactor EFI log item recovery dispatch
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V11.1] Documentation/dax: Update Usage section
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
Next by thread: [PATCH v2] generic: test per-type quota softlimit enforcement timeout
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]