Re: [PATCH 27/30] xfs: clean up the attr flag confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:03:11PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ typedef struct xfs_da_args {
> >  	uint8_t		filetype;	/* filetype of inode for directories */
> >  	void		*value;		/* set of bytes (maybe contain NULLs) */
> >  	int		valuelen;	/* length of value */
> > -	int		flags;		/* argument flags (eg: ATTR_NOCREATE) */
> > +	unsigned int	attr_filter;	/* XFS_ATTR_{ROOT,SECURE} */
> > +	unsigned int	attr_flags;	/* XATTR_{CREATE,REPLACE} */
> 
> At this point, these are really operation flags. I would have named
> the variable attr_opflags but I don't think it's worth redoing the
> entire patch and others over this.

I've renamed it for the next spin together with the other suggstion.
I'll also add tracing for the opflags.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux