From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> Coverity complains that we don't check the return value of xfs_iext_peek_prev_extent like we do nearly all of the time. If there is no previous extent then just null out bma->prev like we do elsewhere in the bmap code. Coverity-id: 1424057 Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c index 64f623d07f82..7392ca92ab34 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c @@ -4014,7 +4014,8 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate( if (bma->wasdel) { bma->length = (xfs_extlen_t)bma->got.br_blockcount; bma->offset = bma->got.br_startoff; - xfs_iext_peek_prev_extent(ifp, &bma->icur, &bma->prev); + if (!xfs_iext_peek_prev_extent(ifp, &bma->icur, &bma->prev)) + bma->prev.br_startoff = NULLFILEOFF; } else { bma->length = XFS_FILBLKS_MIN(bma->length, MAXEXTLEN); if (!bma->eof)