On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:03:06PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> This macro encodes a trivial struct initializations, just open code it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
Hmmmm.
We have defines for this sort of structure definition and
initialisation all over the kernel. e.g. LIST_HEAD(),
DEFINE_PER_CPU(), DEFINE_HASHTABLE(), DEFINE_SPINLOCK(), etc...
And really, the intent of the define was to make it easy to get
rid of all the callers of the non-map buffer interfaces by moving
the map definition into the callers of xfs_buf_get, _read, etc
and then enabling use to remove the non-map interfaces
altogether.
Hence I'd much prefer to see the xfs_buf_{get,read,readahead} and
xfs_trans_buf_{get,read} wrapper functions go away than removing the
define.
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 4 ++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 9 +++------
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 6 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 99c66f80d7cc..389c5b590f11 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ xfs_buf_incore(
> {
> struct xfs_buf *bp;
> int error;
> - DEFINE_SINGLE_BUF_MAP(map, blkno, numblks);
> + struct xfs_buf_map map = { .bm_bn = blkno, .bm_len = numblks };
FWIW, I'm not a fan of single line definitions like this because
they are really hard to read. If you are converting to this form, it
should be like this:
struct xfs_buf_map map = {
.bm_bn = blkno,
.bm_len = numblks,
};
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
