Re: [PATCH v2 09/18] xfs: Factor up commit from xfs_attr_try_sf_addname

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 02:37:17PM -0700, Allison Collins wrote:
> New delayed attribute routines cannot handle transactions,
> so factor this up to the calling function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Allison Collins <allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> index f9d5e28..6bd87e6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ xfs_attr_try_sf_addname(
>  {
>  
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = dp->i_mount;
> -	int			error, error2;
> +	int			error;
>  
>  	error = xfs_attr_shortform_addname(args);
>  	if (error == -ENOSPC)
> @@ -212,9 +212,7 @@ xfs_attr_try_sf_addname(
>  	if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_WSYNC)
>  		xfs_trans_set_sync(args->trans);
>  
> -	error2 = xfs_trans_commit(args->trans);
> -	args->trans = NULL;
> -	return error ? error : error2;
> +	return error;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -226,7 +224,7 @@ xfs_attr_set_args(
>  {
>  	struct xfs_inode	*dp = args->dp;
>  	struct xfs_buf          *leaf_bp = NULL;
> -	int			error;
> +	int			error, error2 = 0;;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the attribute list is non-existent or a shortform list,
> @@ -246,8 +244,11 @@ xfs_attr_set_args(
>  		 * Try to add the attr to the attribute list in the inode.
>  		 */
>  		error = xfs_attr_try_sf_addname(dp, args);
> -		if (error != -ENOSPC)
> -			return error;
> +		if (error != -ENOSPC) {
> +			error2 = xfs_trans_commit(args->trans);

I've wondered about this weird logic... if xfs_attr_shortform_addname
returns an error code other than ENOSPC, why would we commit the
transaction?  Usually we let the error code bounce up to whomever
allocated the transaction and let them cancel it.

Hmm, looking around some more, I guess xfs_attr_shortform_remove can
return ENOATTR to _addname and _shortform_lookup can return EEXIST, but
with either of those error codes, the transaction isn't dirty so it's
not like we're committing garbage state into the filesystem...?

--D

> +			args->trans = NULL;
> +			return error ? error : error2;
> +		}
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * It won't fit in the shortform, transform to a leaf block.
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux