Re: [PATCH 5/8] xfs: refactor inode unlinked pointer update functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 08:27:37AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +	ASSERT(new_agino == NULLAGINO ||
> > +	       xfs_verify_agino(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ino), new_agino));
> 
> We have quite a few uses of this pattern.  Shouldn't we just add a
> a xfs_verify_agino_or_null helper?

Yeah, I'll clean that up.

> Also given that the caller has the agno and we use it a few times
> maybe pass it as an argument?
> 
> Also shouldn't new_agino be called something like next_agino or at
> least have a little comment explaining what it stands for?
> 
> > +	xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, ibp, offset, (offset + sizeof(xfs_agino_t) - 1));
> 
> No need for the innter braces.
> 
> Otherwise this looks conceptually fine to me.

Ok, will fix this and the others.

--D



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux