On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 11:29:04PM -0500, Nick Bowler wrote: > Hello, > > I'm a bit new to using XFS and I ran into some errors trying to enlarge > a filesystem. This setup uses dmcrypt on top of md raid and I just > reshaped the array to add additional storage. The underlying block > device reflects the new size, but the filesystem hasn't been enlarged > yet: > > # blockdev --report /dev/mapper/data > RO RA SSZ BSZ StartSec Size Device > rw 4096 512 4096 0 20001386921984 /dev/mapper/data > > # findmnt /dev/mapper/data > TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS > /mnt/data /dev/mapper/data xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,sunit=1024,swidth=2048,noquota > > # df -h /mnt/data > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/data 9.1T 8.5T 649G 94% /mnt/data > > So I read the manpage and it seems all I should need to do is run > xfs_growfs on the mounted filesystem but... > > # xfs_growfs /mnt/data > meta-data=/dev/mapper/data isize=512 agcount=32, agsize=76299136 blks > = sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=1 > = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0 > = reflink=0 > data = bsize=4096 blocks=2441572352, imaxpct=5 > = sunit=128 swidth=256 blks > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1 > log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=521728, version=2 > = sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1 > realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device > xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY xfsctl failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > ... and the filesystem is not enlarged. Looking at strace output, the > failing ioctls seem to be: > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/mnt/data", O_RDONLY) = 3 > [...] > ioctl(3, _IOC(_IOC_WRITE, 0x58, 0x6e, 0x10), 0xffcc9a80) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device) > [...] > ioctl(3, _IOC(_IOC_READ, 0x58, 0x64, 0x70), 0xffcc9ba0) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device) > > Kernel version is 4.14.82 with xfsprogs 4.17.0, although I tried also > with xfsprogs 4.19.0 and received the same errors. > > Am I missing something obvious here? What further steps should I take > to help solve this? > The only thing that comes to mind while poking through the code is perhaps xfsprogs is sending the traditional XFS_IOC_GROWFSDATA command into the compat_ioctl() path somehow or another (assuming BROKEN_X86_ALIGNMENT is set). What arch is your kernel/xfsprogs? What does 'cat /sys/kernel/debug/trace/trace' show if you run 'trace-cmd start -e xfs:xfs_file*ioctl*' and then attempt the growfs? Brian > Thanks, > Nick