On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:26:14PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:11:06PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:11:39AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > I think this has the same problem that Dave complained about back in > > > October -- if I have a hard disk with 512b sectors, a xfs with 4k > > > blocks, and mount it on a machine with 64k pages, then single-sector > > > buffers will get a small slab allocation, but single-fsb buffers will > > > now fall back to grabbing a 64k page to hold 4k worth of data. > > > > > > Even if we add a second slab for single-fsb blocks, we'll run into the > > > same problem if the filesystem contains multi-block directory blocks, so > > > then we'd potentially need a third slab, and... is there a way to ask a > > > slab allocator for multiple contiguous objects totalling less than > > > PAGE_SIZE bytes? > > > > No, unfortunately there is not. And the sad part is that generally it > > will give you aligned ones, just with slub debugging turned on it won't. > > Hmmm. I guess we could declare three slabs then -- sector size, fsb size, > and dir fsb size? This is getting kinda spidery now though. Is three > too weird? > You can add inode cluster size into the mix as well (see the snipped off portion of my previous reply that I guess was missed). ;P Brian > --D
