On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:49 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:44:24PM +0200, Stefan Ring wrote:
> > I have empirically found and tried to fix some places where stale data was not
> > properly zeroed out.
> >
> > In the order of the code changes:
> >
> > - The "freeindex" blocks in inode directories, from last entry to end of block.
> > - XFS_DIR{2,3}_LEAFN_MAGIC, from last entry to end of block.
> > - In btree format inodes before as well as after the btree pointers.
> > - In dev inodes, everything after the header.
> > ---
> > db/metadump.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c
> > index ff96860d..c8213d41 100644
> > --- a/db/metadump.c
> > +++ b/db/metadump.c
> > @@ -1421,12 +1421,49 @@ process_sf_attr(
> > memset(asfep, 0, XFS_DFORK_ASIZE(dip, mp) - ino_attr_size);
> > }
> >
> > +static void
> > +process_dir_free_block(
>
> I think patch 1 references this function in patch 2?
If this is the case, oops. I thought about this while preparing the
diffs but forgot about it again...
I should find some time this weekend for another round of polishing
these patches.
