Re: [PATCH 11/24] xfs: remove xfs_map_cow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:35:37PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > A comment would be nice here just so the purpose of the logic is clear
> > at a glance. E.g:
> > 
> >                 /*
> >                  * COW fork blocks can overlap data fork blocks even if the
> >                  * blocks aren't shared. COW I/O always takes precedent, so we
> >                  * must always check for overlap on reflink inodes unless the
> >                  * mapping is already COW.
> >                  */
> > 
> > With something like that, this now looks pretty good to me:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I concur, it would help to have a comment to remind everyone that we
> sometimes upgrade to a cow write even when it's not strictly required.
> :)
> 
> With that comment added in,

Do you just want to throw it after the series?  Or should I or Brian
resend it on top of the series?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux