On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:38:38PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 03:01:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > We can handle the existing cow mapping case as a special case directly
> > in xfs_writepage_map, and share code for allocating delalloc blocks
> > with regular I/O in xfs_map_blocks. This means we need to always
> > call xfs_map_blocks for reflink inodes, but we can still skip most of
> > the work if it turns out that there is no COW mapping overlapping the
> > current block.
> >
> > As a subtle detail we need to start caching holes in the wpc to deal
> > with the case of COW reservations between EOF. But we'll need that
> > infrastructure later anyway, so this is no big deal.
> >
> > Based on a patch from Dave Chinner.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h | 4 +-
> > 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > index c8fc6786b06c..ff27bdcc49a1 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> ...
> > @@ -887,22 +877,24 @@ xfs_writepage_map(
> > if (wpc->imap_valid)
> > wpc->imap_valid = xfs_imap_valid(inode, &wpc->imap,
> > offset);
> > - if (!wpc->imap_valid) {
> > - error = xfs_map_blocks(inode, offset, &wpc->imap,
> > - wpc->io_type);
>
> A comment would be nice here just so the purpose of the logic is clear
> at a glance. E.g:
>
> /*
> * COW fork blocks can overlap data fork blocks even if the
> * blocks aren't shared. COW I/O always takes precedent, so we
> * must always check for overlap on reflink inodes unless the
> * mapping is already COW.
> */
>
> With something like that, this now looks pretty good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
I concur, it would help to have a comment to remind everyone that we
sometimes upgrade to a cow write even when it's not strictly required.
:)
With that comment added in,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> Note: I see that this code ends up shifted into xfs_map_blocks(). If
> it's easier to add the comment in whatever patch touches that last,
> that's fine too.
>
> Brian
>
> > + if (!wpc->imap_valid ||
> > + (xfs_is_reflink_inode(XFS_I(inode)) &&
> > + wpc->io_type != XFS_IO_COW)) {
> > + error = xfs_map_blocks(wpc, inode, offset);
> > if (error)
> > goto out;
> > wpc->imap_valid = xfs_imap_valid(inode, &wpc->imap,
> > offset);
> > }
> > - if (wpc->imap_valid) {
> > - lock_buffer(bh);
> > - if (wpc->io_type != XFS_IO_OVERWRITE)
> > - xfs_map_at_offset(inode, bh, &wpc->imap, offset);
> > - xfs_add_to_ioend(inode, bh, offset, wpc, wbc, &submit_list);
> > - count++;
> > - }
> >
> > + if (!wpc->imap_valid || wpc->io_type == XFS_IO_HOLE)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + lock_buffer(bh);
> > + if (wpc->io_type != XFS_IO_OVERWRITE)
> > + xfs_map_at_offset(inode, bh, &wpc->imap, offset);
> > + xfs_add_to_ioend(inode, bh, offset, wpc, wbc, &submit_list);
> > + count++;
> > } while (offset += len, ((bh = bh->b_this_page) != head));
> >
> > ASSERT(wpc->ioend || list_empty(&submit_list));
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h
> > index 694c85b03813..466d22e5bc36 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ enum {
> > XFS_IO_UNWRITTEN, /* covers allocated but uninitialized data */
> > XFS_IO_OVERWRITE, /* covers already allocated extent */
> > XFS_IO_COW, /* covers copy-on-write extent */
> > + XFS_IO_HOLE, /* covers region without any block allocation */
> > };
> >
> > #define XFS_IO_TYPES \
> > @@ -36,7 +37,8 @@ enum {
> > { XFS_IO_DELALLOC, "delalloc" }, \
> > { XFS_IO_UNWRITTEN, "unwritten" }, \
> > { XFS_IO_OVERWRITE, "overwrite" }, \
> > - { XFS_IO_COW, "CoW" }
> > + { XFS_IO_COW, "CoW" }, \
> > + { XFS_IO_HOLE, "hole" }
> >
> > /*
> > * Structure for buffered I/O completions.
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
