On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 05:00:13PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 4/4/18 1:47 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > A semi-random smattering of quota stuff. First three seem quite > > good to go, the rest are more along the lines of a suggestion > > or conversation-starter. ;) > > > > (the first patch is just removing an unused arg). > > > > xfs_repair doesn't look at quota blocks. At all. It relies > > on quotacheck in the kernel to fix them up as needed. > > I'm starting to rethink a lot of this hackery. Why doesn't xfs_repair > just fix things up? (leave quotacheck to the next mount, but the > "repair" stuff in the kernel seems like a really strange wart.) > > I think I'll look at teaching repair to sanity check the quota > inodes, but if anyone knows why that's a bad idea please let me > know. ;) /me shrugs, we still need to fix the kernel's quota verifiers to check the uuid and all that, right? Which means that both are going to need patches, afaict. --D > Thanks, > -Eric > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
