Re: [PATCH 0/6] xfs: quota fixes and enhancements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/4/18 1:47 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> A semi-random smattering of quota stuff.  First three seem quite
> good to go, the rest are more along the lines of a suggestion
> or conversation-starter.  ;)
> 
> (the first patch is just removing an unused arg).
> 
> xfs_repair doesn't look at quota blocks.  At all.  It relies
> on quotacheck in the kernel to fix them up as needed.

I'm starting to rethink a lot of this hackery.  Why doesn't xfs_repair
just fix things up?  (leave quotacheck to the next mount, but the
"repair" stuff in the kernel seems like a really strange wart.)

I think I'll look at teaching repair to sanity check the quota
inodes, but if anyone knows why that's a bad idea please let me
know.  ;)

Thanks,
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux