On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:35:55PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There is no reason to get a mapping bigger than what we were asked for. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Looks ok, will test... Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > index a0afb6411417..c79a3ca20ef8 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > @@ -1331,8 +1331,8 @@ xfs_get_blocks( > end_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, (xfs_ufsize_t)offset + size); > offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset); > > - error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, offset_fsb, end_fsb - offset_fsb, > - &imap, &nimaps, XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE); > + error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, offset_fsb, end_fsb - offset_fsb, &imap, > + &nimaps, 0); > if (error) > goto out_unlock; > > -- > 2.14.2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
