Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: preserve i_rdev when recycling a reclaimable inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 01:07:36PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:44 PM, Darrick J. Wong
> <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:44:29AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >> Commit 66f364649d870 ("xfs: remove if_rdev") moved storing of rdev
> >> value for special inodes to VFS inodes, but forgot to preserve the
> >> value of i_rdev when recycling a reclaimable xfs_inode.
> >>
> >> This was detected by xfstest overlay/017 with inodex=on mount option
> >> and xfs base fs. The test does a lookup of overlay chardev and blockdev
> >> right after drop caches.
> >>
> >> Overlayfs inodes hold a reference on underlying xfs inodes when mount
> >> option index=on is configured. If drop caches reclaim xfs inodes, before
> >> it relclaims overlayfs inodes, that can sometimes leave a reclaimable xfs
> >> inode and that test hits that case quite often.
> >>
> >> When that happens, the xfs inode cache remains broken (zere i_rdev)
> >> until the next cycle mount or drop caches.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 66f364649d870 ("xfs: remove if_rdev")
> >> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Looks ok,
> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> 
> I recon that now we should now also strap:
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #v4.15
> 
> Can I assume, you'll add it on apply?

I'll do a proper backport of this and a couple other critical cow
fixes after I get the 4.16 stuff merged.

--D

> Thanks,
> Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux