Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: preserve i_rdev when recycling a reclaimable inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:44 PM, Darrick J. Wong
<darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:44:29AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> Commit 66f364649d870 ("xfs: remove if_rdev") moved storing of rdev
>> value for special inodes to VFS inodes, but forgot to preserve the
>> value of i_rdev when recycling a reclaimable xfs_inode.
>>
>> This was detected by xfstest overlay/017 with inodex=on mount option
>> and xfs base fs. The test does a lookup of overlay chardev and blockdev
>> right after drop caches.
>>
>> Overlayfs inodes hold a reference on underlying xfs inodes when mount
>> option index=on is configured. If drop caches reclaim xfs inodes, before
>> it relclaims overlayfs inodes, that can sometimes leave a reclaimable xfs
>> inode and that test hits that case quite often.
>>
>> When that happens, the xfs inode cache remains broken (zere i_rdev)
>> until the next cycle mount or drop caches.
>>
>> Fixes: 66f364649d870 ("xfs: remove if_rdev")
>> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks ok,
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

I recon that now we should now also strap:
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #v4.15

Can I assume, you'll add it on apply?

Thanks,
Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux