Re: [PATCH v4 11/18] fs, dax: introduce DEFINE_FSDAX_AOPS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 02-01-18 12:21:28, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_set_page_dirty);
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_direct_IO);
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_writepage);
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_readpage);
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_readpages);
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_write_begin);
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_write_end);
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_invalidatepage);
> >
> > Exporting all these symbols to modules isn't exactly free.  Are you sure it
> > doesn't make more sense to put tests for dax in the existing aops?
> >
> 
> I'd rather have just one global fs_dax_aops instance that all
> filesystems could reference, but ->writepages() is fundamentally an
> address_space_operation. Until we can rework that I'd prefer the
> overhead of the extra exports than sprinkling more IS_DAX checks
> around.

Just for record I agree with what Dave said about this patch. Generic
address_space_operations are not how aops are commonly defined by
filesystems. Just create one structure for each fs as Dave suggested.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux