On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 04:56:59PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> +int dax_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Unlike __set_page_dirty_no_writeback, dax does all dirty
>> + * tracking in the radix in response to mkwrite faults.
>
> Please stop saying "in the radix". I think you mean "in the page cache".
Ok, I'll be more precise and mention the PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY vs
PageDirty distinction.
>
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_set_page_dirty);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_direct_IO);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_writepage);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_readpage);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_readpages);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_write_begin);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_write_end);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_invalidatepage);
>
> Exporting all these symbols to modules isn't exactly free. Are you sure it
> doesn't make more sense to put tests for dax in the existing aops?
>
I'd rather have just one global fs_dax_aops instance that all
filesystems could reference, but ->writepages() is fundamentally an
address_space_operation. Until we can rework that I'd prefer the
overhead of the extra exports than sprinkling more IS_DAX checks
around.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
