On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:24:20PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: >> >> When writing the intermixed output of several fsx processes >> >> to a single log file, it is usefull to prefix logs with a log id. >> >> Use fsx -j <logid> to define the log messages prefix. >> > >> > Would it be better to allow any string as prefix, not limit to id >> > number? >> > >> >> Maybe, but I didn't see an immediate need for that beyond >> the concurrent test runs, for with numeric id is sufficient. > > I agreed, I don't have strong preference on this. > Nah, you were right the first time. Using numeric id was just me being lazy and then I had a bug where -j 0 (not surprising) does not prefix logs with 0: I'll fix this and re-post the fsx patches. Amir. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
