On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:24:20PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> When writing the intermixed output of several fsx processes > >> to a single log file, it is usefull to prefix logs with a log id. > >> Use fsx -j <logid> to define the log messages prefix. > > > > Would it be better to allow any string as prefix, not limit to id > > number? > > > > Maybe, but I didn't see an immediate need for that beyond > the concurrent test runs, for with numeric id is sufficient. I agreed, I don't have strong preference on this. Thanks, Eryu > > Besides, the function that prepends the prefix, prt() > is sometimes uses for continued line, which results with > weird looking lines like this one: > > 1: 60( 60 mod 256): 1: FALLOC 0x30140 thru 0x30f3c (0xdfc bytes) > 1: EXTENDING1: > > So it's not really worth fixing properly, but anything more then a single > numeric prefix is going to look quite bad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
