On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 14:49 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > gcc-7 flags the use of integer math inside of a condition > as a potential bug: > > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c: In function 'xfs_swap_extents_check_format': > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1619:8: error: '<<' in boolean context, did you mean '<' ? [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1629:8: error: '<<' in boolean context, did you mean '<' ? [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] > > This one is clearly fine, and we can add a comparison to zero > to shut up the warning. [] > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c [] > @@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents_check_format( > * extent format... > */ > if (tip->i_d.di_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE) { > - if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) && > + if ((XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) != 0) && As far as I can tell, this suggestion makes no sense. $ git grep -E "define\s+XFS_IFORK_BOFF" fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h:#define XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) ((int)((ip)->i_d.di_forkoff << 3)) $ git grep -w di_forkoff|grep -P "\w+\s+di_forkoff\s*;" fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h: __u8 di_forkoff; /* attr fork offs, <<3 for 64b align */ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.h: __uint8_t di_forkoff; /* attr fork offs, <<3 for 64b align */ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h: __uint8_t di_forkoff; /* attr fork offs, <<3 for 64b align */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html