Le Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:45:07 -0500
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:
> >
> > I don't see why or where we'd use filestreams there... What's the
> > use case actually?
>
> well, it's in your crash backtrace, so you tell me ;)
>
I remember now... There writing files in long sequences, so that's what
the filestream option is for. It worked fine for a few months though...
> >>>
> >>> The machine goes on crashing on disk access... xfs_repair 4.9 is
> >>> running now, and after that we'll reboot with a current kernel
> >>> (4.4.59). Any advice?
> >>
> >> Yep, go back in time & get an xfs_metadump before you repair
> >> it. :(
> >
> > You know how it goes it crashes, users scream, administrator jumps
> > on xfs_repair, and the rest is history.
> >
> >> Please do at least capture repair output.
> >>
> >
> > Well the only thing I know is "there was nothing special in
> > xfs_repair output"... I'll tell the admin to catch the output next
> > time if necessary...
>
> So it crashed on every access, and repair fixed it, but repair said
> "nothing special" in the process? :(
>
It crashes, it reboots without complaining, so there aren't any grave
obvious upfront problems at least...
Well we'll see if it crashes again with a 4.4.59... Just in case we
removed the filestreams option in the fstab.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgp1hE0ardI0B.pgp
Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP
