On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:08:30PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The length is now passed by reference, so the assertion has to be updated
> to match the other changes, as pointed out by this W=1 warning:
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c: In function 'xfs_extent_busy_trim':
> fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c:356:13: error: ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero [-Werror=extra]
>
> Fixes: ebf55872616c ("xfs: improve handling of busy extents in the low-level allocator")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied (4.11).
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> index ab062610234e..77760dbf0242 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_trim(
> struct rb_node *rbp;
> bool ret = false;
>
> - ASSERT(len > 0);
> + ASSERT(*len > 0);
>
> spin_lock(&args->pag->pagb_lock);
> restart:
> --
> 2.9.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
