The length is now passed by reference, so the assertion has to be updated
to match the other changes, as pointed out by this W=1 warning:
fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c: In function 'xfs_extent_busy_trim':
fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c:356:13: error: ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero [-Werror=extra]
Fixes: ebf55872616c ("xfs: improve handling of busy extents in the low-level allocator")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
index ab062610234e..77760dbf0242 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_trim(
struct rb_node *rbp;
bool ret = false;
- ASSERT(len > 0);
+ ASSERT(*len > 0);
spin_lock(&args->pag->pagb_lock);
restart:
--
2.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
