On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 09:36:30AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 12:32:58PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:08:25PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote: > > > After successful IO or permanent error, b_first_retry_time also > > > needs to be cleared, else the invalid first retry time will be > > > used by the next retry check. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c > > > index 2975cb2..0306168 100644 > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c > > > @@ -1162,6 +1162,7 @@ xfs_buf_iodone_callbacks( > > > */ > > > bp->b_last_error = 0; > > > bp->b_retries = 0; > > > + bp->b_first_retry_time = 0; > > > > Looks ok, will try to queue it up as an rc7 fix. > > It's not a critical bug, nor is it a regression introduced in > 4.10-rc1, so IMO it's not a -rc7 candidate fix. Just add it in the > for-next queue and mark it for stable. It'll still get to most users > at pretty much the same time via the stable trees... Ok. I'll queue it up for 4.11 then. --D > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
