On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:11:35AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Philosophically (I'm good at that) how do we handle tests like this > that really only work on the latest version of the code, but don't > actually indicate a bug if it fails on something older? That might be another argument for doing the smaller than check that Darrick suggested. Or an argument for simply stopping to check xfs_dsb, it's growing constantly. Checking the offsets of known fields IFF present wold seem more useful. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
