On 1/24/17 11:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:08:19AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >> We're not going to do reverse-mapping on the realtime device for >> some time, so let's fix xfs/122 in the meantime. >> >> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks fine, > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Philosophically (I'm good at that) how do we handle tests like this that really only work on the latest version of the code, but don't actually indicate a bug if it fails on something older? -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html