On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:42:46 -0600 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1/16/17 7:45 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:32:00 -0600 > > Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 9/10/16 2:37 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > >>> --- > >>> > >>> Based on the earlier discussion this seems to be the preferred way > >>> of handling things. > >>> > >>> Should I split it into 3 patches? > >>> Do you want something different to happen when > >>> cross-compiling? > >> > >> Hi Ralph - > >> > >> I just merged a patch to for-next to address cross-compiling; > >> it was on the list prior to this one. > >> > >> Can you confirm that it resolves your issues? > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > I compile tested 4.9.0 with > > 0a71e38396304b4d1215ba0b51cd6ce8e33eb40d on top. Cross-compiling is > > fixed for me with this leaving only the d_namlen issue with musl > > for which you already reviewed a patch from me. If that gets > > addressed I can use vanilla xfsprogs. > > Hi Ralph, that should have been merged as well. Check out the > for-next branch of the git tree. How did I miss that ... :) Thanks Ralph > > Thanks, > -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
