On 1/16/17 7:45 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:32:00 -0600 > Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 9/10/16 2:37 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: >>> --- >>> >>> Based on the earlier discussion this seems to be the preferred way >>> of handling things. >>> >>> Should I split it into 3 patches? >>> Do you want something different to happen when cross-compiling? >> >> Hi Ralph - >> >> I just merged a patch to for-next to address cross-compiling; >> it was on the list prior to this one. >> >> Can you confirm that it resolves your issues? > > Hi Eric, > > I compile tested 4.9.0 with 0a71e38396304b4d1215ba0b51cd6ce8e33eb40d on > top. Cross-compiling is fixed for me with this leaving only the d_namlen > issue with musl for which you already reviewed a patch from me. If that > gets addressed I can use vanilla xfsprogs. Hi Ralph, that should have been merged as well. Check out the for-next branch of the git tree. Thanks, -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
