Hello,
On úterý 13. prosince 2016 16:59:26 CET Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 78 ++++++++
+--------------------------------------
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> index 91a6c17..87328a8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> @@ -1149,11 +1104,6 @@ xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near(
> XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO(args->mp, i == 1, error0);
> ASSERT(ltbno + ltlen <= be32_to_cpu(XFS_BUF_TO_AGF(args->agbp)-
>agf_length));
> args->len = blen;
> - if (!xfs_alloc_fix_minleft(args)) {
> - xfs_btree_del_cursor(cnt_cur, XFS_BTREE_NOERROR);
> - trace_xfs_alloc_near_nominleft(args);
> - return 0;
> - }
> blen = args->len;
> /*
> * We are allocating starting at bnew for blen blocks.
Doesn't this produce this code?
args->len = blen;
blen = args->len;
Libor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
