Hello, On úterý 13. prosince 2016 10:04:27 CET Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 12/13/16 4:52 AM, Libor Klep�? wrote: > > Hello, > > should this patch possibly fix errors i reported in this thread? > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg01728.html > > > > Is it safe to test it? (i do have backups) > > It should be safe, yes. > ok, will try it soon(ish) with machines named vps1 and vps3 in my mails. vps2 is problematic to shutdown and test. > (you could always run xfs_repair -n first to be extra careful). > > Were those errors during mount/replay, though, or was it when the > filesystem was up and running? > It was always when running, some errors were just logged, some caused fs shutdown > I ask because I also sent a patch to ignore these empty attributes > in the verifier during log replay. > > FWIW, Only some of your reported buffers look "empty" though, the one > at 514098.682726 may have had something else wrong. > Ok, i see, it has some "data" in it > Anyway, yes, probably worth checking with xfs_repair (-n) with this > patch added. Let us know what you find! :) > > -Eric > Libor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
