Re: [PATCH] [v2] at86rf230: convert to gpio descriptors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

On 01.02.23 17:19, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello Dmitry.

On 01.02.23 01:50, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:52 PM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:32 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

          /* Reset */
-       if (gpio_is_valid(rstn)) {
+       if (rstn) {
                  udelay(1);
-               gpio_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 0);
+               gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 0);
                  udelay(1);
-               gpio_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 1);
+               gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 1);

For gpiod conversions, if we are not willing to chase whether existing
DTSes specify polarities
properly and create workarounds in case they are wrong, we should use
gpiod_set_raw_value*()
(my preference would be to do the work and not use "raw" variants).

In this particular case, arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-c.dts
defines reset line as active low,
so you are leaving the device in reset state.

Please review your other conversion patches.

We also can not change the names of requested GPIOs from "reset-gpio"
to "rstn-gpios" and expect
this to work.

Stefan, please consider reverting this and applying a couple of
patches I will send out shortly.

Thanks for having another look at these patches. Do you have the same
concern for the convesion patch to cc2520 that has been posted and applied
as well?

There are no DT users of cc2520 in the tree, so while ideally reset line
should not be left in "logical active" state at the end of the probe, we
can deal with this in a follow up patch, I doubt it will lead to
regressions as it is.

If I were really nitpicky I would adjust error messages when we fail to
get GPIOs, but again, can be done as a followup.

Feel free to send patches if you are in the mood on fixing this as well. :-)

Arnd, if you have any concerns about the revert please speak up soon as I am
going to revert your patch and get these patches into my tree later today.


Thanks.

Reverted and pushed now. Your patches are applied as well. Thanks again for catching this early on.

regards
Stefan Schmidt




[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux