On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 22:59:14 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote: > I was swamped today and I am only now finding time to go through mail. > > Given the problem these ifdef are raising I am ok with having these > commands exposed without them. > > Our main reason for having this feature marked as experimental is that > it does not have much exposure and we fear that some of it needs rewrites. > > If that really is going to happen we will simply treat the current > commands as reserved/burned and come up with other ones if needed. While > I hope this will not be needed it is a fair plan for mitigating this. Thanks for the replies. I keep going back and forth in my head on what's better - un-hiding or just using NL802154_CMD_SET_WPAN_PHY_NETNS + 1 as the start of validation, since it's okay to break experimental commands. Any preference?
